On Nov 13, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Eric Christopher <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > I talked with Greg and he said that accel tables wouldn't work with LTO. The > problem is triggered even with `-gline-tables-only'. I don't have a small > testcase, but you need to build LLVM with LTO and `-gline-tables-only' then > run dwarfdump on it like I said. > > > That's curious, did he give a reason? I think it had to do with messed up debug info. Greg, could you explain a bit more? > You can have an accelerator table for a final executable. That said the > accelerator tables make not sense for -gline-tables-only which could be > causing you the problems you're see since there's very little info for the > tables to work with and there could be issues there. There should be a DIE > for each entry in the names table. What do, for example, those offsets give > you? > The offsets are bogus. I can't find them in the dwarfdump. > > Do you have a particular set of output from the verify to show what's going > > on here? > > > These are the first several lines of the verify output. It's big. > > Not surprising as it's pretty heinous debug info at this point. So, what are > the DIE offsets for those functions? llvm-dwarfdump doesn't dump them at the > moment so you'll need to use dwarfdump to look for the functions. > I'll take a look after lunch. I might be able to reduce a testcase to look at... -bw _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
