>
> > I think it had to do with messed up debug info. Greg, could you explain
> a bit more?
>
> We don't need them for now. We will require a dSYM for LTO for a while
> until we can update LLDB to handle linking LTO dwarf in .o files.
>
>
Oh sure, that's orthogonal to what Bill's doing though. Whether or not
they're needed or dsymutil recreates them is totally separate from whether
or not they're correct when they're being emitted.

-eric
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to