On Dec 18, 2012, at 11:29 , Ted Kremenek <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2012, at 7:53 PM, Sean Silva <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> But it has its own website, clang-analyzer.llvm.org. >> >> I'm curious about this. Why is it not sufficient to simply be >> clang.llvm.org/analyzer (which works)? > > For reference, the fact that this URL works is a curiosity, not something > users know about. We don't direct users to that URL. I did not come up with > this setup. Apparently it was easier to setup the website this way at the > time. If it makes sense to move the analyzer website to a different > repository, I am completely in favor of doing so. ...although I agree with Sean that docs/analyzer/ should stay in the same repo as the analyzer source (even if it moves elsewhere in the Clang repo).
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
