Yes, i never knew why folks waited for this. It was trivially correct, and I've jsut been looking at other things.
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 6:16 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi <[email protected]>wrote: > > --- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGValue.h (original) > > +++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGValue.h Sun Dec 23 19:48:48 2012 > > @@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ > > > > /// \brief Create a new object to represent a bit-field access. > > /// > > - /// \param BaseValue - The base address of the bit-field sequence this > > + /// \param Addr - The base address of the bit-field sequence this > > /// bit-field refers to. > > /// \param Info - The information describing how to perform the > bit-field > > /// access. > > Chandler, does it make sense? > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
