On Monday, December 24, 2012, Chandler Carruth wrote: > Yes, i never knew why folks waited for this. It was trivially correct, and > I've jsut been looking at other things. >
I just don't touch code unless I am sure that I understand it. Since you changed both the function and the parameter name, documentation might have become irrelevant, so the fix is not that obvious. Dmitri > > On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 6:16 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi > <[email protected]<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '[email protected]');> > > wrote: > >> > --- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGValue.h (original) >> > +++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGValue.h Sun Dec 23 19:48:48 2012 >> > @@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ >> > >> > /// \brief Create a new object to represent a bit-field access. >> > /// >> > - /// \param BaseValue - The base address of the bit-field sequence >> this >> > + /// \param Addr - The base address of the bit-field sequence this >> > /// bit-field refers to. >> > /// \param Info - The information describing how to perform the >> bit-field >> > /// access. >> >> Chandler, does it make sense? >> _______________________________________________ >> cfe-commits mailing list >> [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', >> '[email protected]');> >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >> > > -- main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if (j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <[email protected]>*/
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
