On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Edwin Vane <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I don't know anything about the analyzer but it sounds like it is what > is driving the design. For tools this all looks good if only a little > heavy-handed. Your suggestions for improvements that would make parent map > construction not touch the whole AST would be welcome. > > Question: does MatchASTVisitor::matchesAncestorOf() need fixing to use > the new ASTContext::getParents()? > Yes, and that's part of the patch. At least if I didn't mess anything up? :) > > http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D267 >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
