Doug, I'll not submit before I get an ok from you :)
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Jordan Rose <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sorry, I haven't commented because it looks like it's going to be less > and less relevant to the analyzer. As much as I don't like having two > similar data structures floating around, Edwin's right that we don't need > to try to optimize for two different use cases if it means that we won't > get optimal behavior in either. > > This design is at least not incompatible with what the analyzer needs, > in case we can ever unify them in the future. We may want to rename the > analyzer's class StmtParentMap, and migrate the other users > (migrators/translators) to AST's ParentMap. > > http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D267 >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
