On Feb 7, 2013, at 7:39 AM, Tim Northover <[email protected]> wrote: > Author: tnorthover > Date: Thu Feb 7 09:39:16 2013 > New Revision: 174627 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=174627&view=rev > Log: > FileCheckize volatile test
I appreciate the thought, but changing it from just counting the number of times 'volatile' shows up to, essentially, putting a minimum on the number of times 'volatile load' shows up is not a huge improvement. Would you mind further improving this test to (1) actually match the operands and (2) do the negative testing for the lines which we expect to produce non-volatile loads? John. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
