On Feb 8, 2013, at 12:01 AM, Tim Northover <[email protected]> wrote: >> I appreciate the thought, but changing it from just counting the number of >> times >> 'volatile' shows up to, essentially, putting a minimum on the number of times >> 'volatile load' shows up is not a huge improvement. > > Thanks John. It was actually far worse even than that. I'd not even > checked all of the volatiles present. It should be greatly improved in > r174700.
Thanks, Tim! John. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
