On 15/03/2013 17:27, Jordan Rose wrote: > From that site: > >> The 'powerpcspe' architecture is a binary-incompatible variant of the >> PowerPC/POWER designed and supported by FreeScale and IBM. It is also known >> under the trade names "e500"/"MPC8500" and "e200"/"MPC5xx". > > I'm not really qualified to make this call, but it sounds like changing the > OS/vendor part of the triple seems like the wrong thing to do. Is there a > reason why you didn't change the CPU part and then just make it an alias of > PowerPC for now? Well, I am not really qualified too :) I applied the patch provided by the porter of powerpcspe for Debian (C/C of this email). AFAIK, it makes clang works.
However, if you think there is a better way, I would be happy to revert this commit and implement it. Sylvestre _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
