On 03/15/2013 05:32 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > On 15/03/2013 17:27, Jordan Rose wrote: >> From that site: >> >>> The 'powerpcspe' architecture is a binary-incompatible variant of the >>> PowerPC/POWER designed and supported by FreeScale and IBM. It is also known >>> under the trade names "e500"/"MPC8500" and "e200"/"MPC5xx". >> >> I'm not really qualified to make this call, but it sounds like changing the >> OS/vendor part of the triple seems like the wrong thing to do. Is there a >> reason why you didn't change the CPU part and then just make it an alias of >> PowerPC for now? > Well, I am not really qualified too :) > I applied the patch provided by the porter of powerpcspe for Debian (C/C > of this email). AFAIK, it makes clang works. > > However, if you think there is a better way, I would be happy to revert > this commit and implement it.
Works fine - as it does for thousands of other packages also. :-) Thanks for applying! Roland _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
