On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 11:55:20 +0000 Renato Golin <[email protected]> wrote: > You're changing both EABI and GNUEABI but only testing one of them. I can add a test for EABI but only GNUEABI will be supported on FreeBSD. > > I can't see any problem arising from this change, but I'm still > curious as to why this is needed. I may be wrong, but I think that > "version 0" is assumed to be the current version. So, the only real > need to set an ABI version would be if there was a new one that would > break this one (which is very unlikely). Without this patch gcc fails to link with objects and libraries generated by clang.
> Being that the case, I think we shouldn't force ABI version 5 on all > EABI binaries produced from clang. And since you can do that via > command line, there's no rush in getting it in either. How? When using an external assembler the the ABI version is sever passed to it so will be 0. Andrew _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
