On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 12:41:51 +0000 Renato Golin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 17 March 2013 12:28, Anton Korobeynikov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Are you sure? I saw cross-gcc forcing eabi value to 4 or 5 many > > times. I do not recall why it was so (e.g. whether the compiler was > > explicitly configured to do so). > > > > Ok, that's odd... > > $ arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc -c foo.c > $ arm-linux-gnueabihf-readelf -h foo.o > ELF Header: > (...) > ABI Version: 0 > (...) > Flags: 0x5000000, Version5 EABI > > Either readelf is being misled or that "ABI Version" field is just > wrong... > > As I said before, I think this change is harmless for now, just make > sure you test EABI, too (or stick to GNUEABI only). The ABI Version field is different. The patch is to set the Version5 EABI flag in the Flags field. Andrew _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
