On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:16 PM, John McCall <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mar 22, 2013, at 9:58 AM, Reid Kleckner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:14 PM, John McCall <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> All these tests are pretty inadequate;  you could be accidentally doing
>>  a lot of stuff besides the stores.  You should basically be testing the
>> entire
>> function body, including the define line.  This will also let you
>> effectively
>> test that you're generating the right IR type, which will be important
>> when
>> you start generating different IR types for different cases.
>>
>
> OK, now the alloca and its size is part of the test.  That should
> constrain the size of the member pointer to a single slot.
>
>
> Might as well use CHECK-NEXT for everything after the first alloca line.
>

Sure, modulo the labels I omitted around the if lowering.

With that, feel free to commit, thanks!
>

Thanks for the review!
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to