On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 4:53 PM, John McCall <[email protected]> wrote:
> It'd be nice if whoever made this change also added a C++11-only > std::initializer_list constructor while they're at it. > > That sounds like a great use for initializer lists! I suppose it makes sense to use None as a stand-in for now, but I get the feeling that every other person that reads the code is going to be sent on a wild goose chase figuring out what the heck is going on. Than again, maybe it will just become idiomatic... -- Sean Silva
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
