> Oh ok, thanks, I can do that instead. Minor issue would be that > arrangeCXXConstructorDeclaration calls > CGCXXABI::BuildConstructorSignature (and similarly for > arrangeCXXDestructor), which sets the return type to the type of > 'this', but ConstructAttributeList would then call > CGCXXABI::HasThisReturn to determine if there's a 'this' return, so > there'd be an implicit assumption that the two implementations are > consistent with each other, whereas in the version I just posted > ultimately gets the information for both from > CGCXXABI::BuildConstructorSignature. If you're OK with that I'll go > with that (with an assert as a consistency sanity check).
Never mind I'll fix that too. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
