Here's a freshly rebased pair of patches.
this-return1.patch
Description: Binary data
Description: Binary dataOn May 20, 2013, at 2:08 PM, Stephen Lin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi John, > > Do you think this can go in? > > If you have any suggestions for implementation improvements or extra > tests (either front-end or back-end) let me know; in addition to the > front-end tests added in this patch the relevant the back-end tests > are: > > llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/this-return.ll > llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/returned-ext.ll > llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll > > Thanks, > Stephen > > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Stephen Lin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Enabling a new and not-necessarily-deeply-tested feature/optimization is >>> actually specifically the sort of thing we try *not* to do right before a >>> release branch. :) >> >> Oh OK. Well, I just thought it'd be better if the backend and frontend >> portions of this went out in the same release. If it's not really >> worth it at this point then I'm OK waiting. Let me know. >> >> -Stephen_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
