On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 3:02 AM, jahanian <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On May 3, 2013, at 4:57 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 2:15 AM, Fariborz Jahanian <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> Author: fjahanian
>>> Date: Fri May 3 18:15:20 2013
>>> New Revision: 181071
>>>
>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=181071&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> [Doc parsing] Provide diagnostics for unknown documentation
>>> commands. // rdar://12381408
>>
>> I think this diagnostic will be extremely noisy (should it be off by
>> default?). We should definitely do typo-correction -- there's a list
>
> I don't know. It caught two unknown in clang's tests. But, we don't want
> to have too many new warnings where I come from. So, I will make it ignored
> for now.
>
>> of known commands available.
>
> Yes, there will be a typo correction coming (it is part of above radar).
This is a weird suggestion (there are no other warnings like that),
but anyway: we could emit this diagnostic by default only if we have a
very good correction.
Dmitri
--
main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
(j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <[email protected]>*/
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
