On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Charles Davis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On May 14, 2013, at 4:26 PM, Aaron Ballman wrote:
> >
> >> Do __sptr and __uptr get different manglings?
> >
> > They do:
> >
> > void func( int * __ptr32 p ) {}
> > void func2( int * __ptr64 p ) {}
> >
> > PUBLIC ?func@@YAXPAH@Z ; func
> > PUBLIC ?func2@@YAXPEAH@Z ; func2
> >
> > Namely, the presence of E (rnk pointed this out previously).
> He was asking about __sptr and __uptr :). They don't by the way:
>
> > cl /c test.cpp
> [extraneous banner output omitted]
> > dumpbin /symbols test.obj
> [...]
> 00F 00000010 SECT4 notype () External | ?func@@YAXPAH@Z (void
> __cdecl func(int *))
> 010 00000020 SECT4 notype () External | ?func2@@YAXPAH@Z (void
> __cdecl func2(int *))
Thanks. One more thing:
template<typename T> void f(void **p, T *q) { *p = *q; }
void *g(int *__ptr32 __sptr a) {
void *result;
f(&result, &a);
return result;
}
void *h(char *__ptr32 __uptr a) {
void *result;
f(&result, &a);
return result;
}
int main() {
printf("%p\n", g((int *__ptr32 __sptr)0xdeadbeef));
printf("%p\n", h((char *__ptr32 __uptr)0xdeadbeef));
}
Does one of these get sign-extended and the other one get zero-extended?
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
