On Jun 17, 2013 5:18 PM, "Arthur O'Dwyer" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 4:42 PM, John McCall <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jun 17, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Arthur O'Dwyer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Is there anything preventing this patch > >> from going in, at this point? > >> > >> I've attached two versions of the patch: one with SRC_OnStack and > >> SRC_InRegs, and one with SRCK_OnStack and SRCK_InRegs. There's no > >> other difference between them. I believe I prefer the SRCK_ version; > >> thanks, Jordan! > > > > Either one LGTM. > > Hooray! John, could you please commit the SRCK_ version? > > (I believe I don't have checkin privileges, which is a special case of > "random strangers don't have checkin privileges", which is a good > thing. But FWIW, I can't figure out how one gets such privileges. I > would have expected it to be explained on > http://clang.llvm.org/hacking.html.)
http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html > > Thanks, > -Arthur > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
