On Aug 14, 2013, at 3:45 AM, David Chisnall <[email protected]> wrote:
>> rm -f libc++.so >> - ln -s libc++.so.1 libc++.so >> + ln -s libc++.so.1.0 libc++.so >> ;; >> esac >> >> All, please examine the last line: >> >> - ln -s libc++.so.1 libc++.so >> + ln -s libc++.so.1.0 libc++.so > > This does, however. We don't usually use a.b version numbers. It isn't of > vital importance, however, as we don't use the upstream build system for the > libc++ that we ship, although it would be mildly inconvenient for people who > are building a newer version for testing. > > Oh, and ln -sf is generally better than rm then ln, as it allows the > operation to be atomic. Xing, can you rework this part so that it is -ibm-only? Howard _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
