I have a reservation about one of the comments. I will fix the rest of the 
issues in a new version of the patch (probably tomorrow).


================
Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp:534
@@ +533,3 @@
+  SValBuilder &SVB = State->getStateManager().getSValBuilder();
+  return State->BindExpr(E, LC, SVB.evalCast(X, B->getType(), XType));
+}
----------------
Jordan Rose wrote:
> Rather than have this bind anything, why not just return the properly-casted 
> value?
For this patch, I could indeed just return the correct SVal. However, here I am 
also preparing the ground for the second patch. For that, I need the value to 
be stored in the state, so that I can later query them when I run through the 
temporary destructor branches. So, in theory I could do the binding only when 
cfg-temporary-dtors is true, but I'm not sure if that's worth the increased 
code complexity.


http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1340
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to