On Aug 23, 2013, at 11:48 AM, Howard Hinnant <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Aug 22, 2013, at 10:48 PM, G M <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> @Reid, sorry about the tabs. Hopefully this version has rid them..
>> Yes from what I can tell they are all C era functions. VS was warning me 
>> about the situation.
>> 
>> Infact, in the situation, even the unique_ptr is over the top. So I've 
>> removed that too. I put this stuff in myself a while back.
>> The original code was much like it is now. I thought I was being clever 
>> C++ifying it, but now I think I was just over complicating it. This gets rid 
>> of the VS warnings now too.
>> 
>> @Marshall I couldn't see find two instances of my "automaticlaly" typo.just 
>> the one?
>> But I've deleted the one I did find since I don't think I need it at all now.
>> 
>> I think the noexcept suggestion for the free delete was good. I'll remember 
>> that if I reinstate it.
>> 
>> But won't the suggestion to remove the namespace reveal the type to the 
>> linker in a way that might clash with other code if I don't also move the 
>> type into the function too or take more steps like that? I didn't do that 
>> because I didn't want to discourage some else from using it in the same 
>> module.
> 
> Thanks for the repost.  I got a merge failure for 
> src/support/win32/support.cpp:
> 
> patching file support.cpp
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 22.
> 1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file support.cpp.rej
> 
> Could you svn update and then reform the diff?

Received patch via private email and committed revision 189273.

Howard

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to