On Sep 13, 2013, at 1:03 AM, Anders Waldenborg <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:45:35AM -0700, Argyrios Kyrtzidis wrote: >> Since libclang is supposed to be somewhat higher level and closer to the >> source, could we just report a DecayedType as the original (as written) one ? >> Or do you have a specific use case where you need to know that it is a >> DecayedType ? > > Not really. So something like attached patch instead? Yes, could you also add a test in test/Index/print-type.cpp ? > > thanks > <hide-decayed.patch> _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
