On Sep 14, 2013, at 12:36 PM, Anders Waldenborg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Since libclang is supposed to be somewhat higher level and closer to the >>>> source, could we just report a DecayedType as the original (as written) >>>> one ? >>>> Or do you have a specific use case where you need to know that it is a >>>> DecayedType ? >>> >>> Not really. So something like attached patch instead? >> >> Yes, could you also add a test in test/Index/print-type.cpp ? > > test/Index/print-type.cpp already had a test. In c++ that is not > exposed as an DecayedType. So added test in test/Index/print-type.c > instead. Committed in r190796, thanks! > > > thanks > <hide-decayed-thirdtimesacharm.patch> _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
