On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 04:58:55PM -0700, Chandler Carruth wrote: > Whether it is correct or not, people were not using -minline-all-stringops > to avoid calling out to libc for them, they were using it as equivalent to > -O9 or whatever. =/ By ignoring this flag we correctly compile a nontrivial > amount of code out there.
My gut instinct tells me that it might be the path of least resistence to silently accept -fexpensive-optimisations, but that it doesn't make sense to give -minline-all-stringops the same threatment. I am going to run some field study now to verify the intuition. I can already say that there are a number of wtf moments ahead... Joerg _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
