On 21/10/2013 22:08, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 09:59:24PM +0100, Alp Toker wrote: >> Here's a pure guess, not tested but whatever the implementation ends up >> being it'll surely take less time than continuing the debate: > The core of the issue is that LLVM can create calls to memset and memcpy > itself, even under -ffreestanding.
Ouch, I hadn't realised this. Maybe ignoring the flag more sense after all, at least until the underlying issue affecting -ffreestanding is fixed. That's the elephant in the room. > > Joerg > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits -- http://www.nuanti.com the browser experts _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
