================ Comment at: include/clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchers.h:1690 @@ -1684,1 +1689,3 @@ + TemplateSpecializationType), + false>(InnerMatcher); } ---------------- Manuel Klimek wrote: > /*EnableCompileTimeChecks=*/false > (here and elsewhere) > > On the other hand, I'm not sure I like this (and I've gone back and forth on > that detail myself ;) > There's some principal beauty to being able to use all nodes that have > getDecl() in hasDeclaration. On the other hand, the further down we push the > error checks, the worse the error messages for our users. Due to how bad > template error messages still are, this is one of the largest problems we > have today. The dynamic matchers will hopefully get some of that out of the > way, but I still believe that for now we just want to spell out all the types > it's callable on. Do you have a such a list? >From the implementation of HasDeclarationMatcher is not obvious.
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1889 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
