On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Manuel Klimek <[email protected]> wrote: > I personally actually think we should somehow bake clang-format into the > extension (if possible) and distribute it via the visual studio gallery.
Sounds great. Do you want to take a stab at this? ;) In any case, I won't worry about this for the 3.4 release. I feel bad trying to scramble to do this stuff way after the branch point. - Hans > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Kim Gräsman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Hans Wennborg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> 2) The target audiences are fairly distinct. Most clang-format Visual >> >> Studio >> >> extension users likely don't want or need an LLVM installation. This is >> >> the >> >> crowd who'd benefit most from a single click installation on the >> >> download >> >> page that works the same way as other VS extensions. >> >> >> >> Wouldn't it make more sense to offer the Visual Studio extension as a >> >> separate download? >> > >> > If we want to support that, we should bake clang-format into the >> > extension itself. >> > >> > Manuel: maybe that's what we should be doing? >> >> I think that would make more sense. I'm already distributing private >> builds of clang-format to co-workers who've installed the extension, >> because the only way to get clang-format is to install all of LLVM. >> >> FWIW, >> - Kim >> _______________________________________________ >> cfe-commits mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
