On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Hans Wennborg <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Manuel Klimek <[email protected]> wrote: > > I personally actually think we should somehow bake clang-format into the > > extension (if possible) and distribute it via the visual studio gallery. > > Sounds great. Do you want to take a stab at this? ;) > > In any case, I won't worry about this for the 3.4 release. I feel bad > trying to scramble to do this stuff way after the branch point. > Oh, this is totally not important for the 3.4 release - I just thought that the multi-VS-version support is cool enough that it'd be good to have a release of it on builds/. > - Hans > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Kim Gräsman <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Hans Wennborg <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> 2) The target audiences are fairly distinct. Most clang-format Visual > >> >> Studio > >> >> extension users likely don't want or need an LLVM installation. This > is > >> >> the > >> >> crowd who'd benefit most from a single click installation on the > >> >> download > >> >> page that works the same way as other VS extensions. > >> >> > >> >> Wouldn't it make more sense to offer the Visual Studio extension as a > >> >> separate download? > >> > > >> > If we want to support that, we should bake clang-format into the > >> > extension itself. > >> > > >> > Manuel: maybe that's what we should be doing? > >> > >> I think that would make more sense. I'm already distributing private > >> builds of clang-format to co-workers who've installed the extension, > >> because the only way to get clang-format is to install all of LLVM. > >> > >> FWIW, > >> - Kim > >> _______________________________________________ > >> cfe-commits mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > > > > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
