On 22 November 2013 23:35, Jim Grosbach <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah. It’s a long road, and also raises the typical questions of just how > much GCC command line compatibility is worth, etc.. >
Indeed, but we digressed. ;) Is the current patch conforming to Darwin usage of arch/march/mcpu? Mainly that boils down to: are the added Darwin tests enough to guarantee compatibility? cheers, --renato
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
