On Jan 14, 2014, at 4:18 PM, Jordan Rose <[email protected]> wrote:

> The problem isn't that it's unimplemented, it's that it's undeclared. And 
> @selector isn't really an operator. How about "no methods visible for 
> selector %0" or "no methods declared for selector %0 in this translation 
> unit”?

Warning is for when a method is declared but no implementation of it is seen in 
the translation unit. I am not sure what you mean
by an "undeclared method”? Do you consider a method declared in an @interface 
but its implementation (or definition) is not
in the current TU, an ‘undeclared method’?

- Fariborz

> 
> Jordan
> 
> 
> O

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to