On Jan 14, 2014, at 16:33 , jahanian <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 14, 2014, at 4:18 PM, Jordan Rose <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The problem isn't that it's unimplemented, it's that it's undeclared. And >> @selector isn't really an operator. How about "no methods visible for >> selector %0" or "no methods declared for selector %0 in this translation >> unit”? > > Warning is for when a method is declared but no implementation of it is seen > in the translation unit. I am not sure what you mean > by an "undeclared method”? Do you consider a method declared in an @interface > but its implementation (or definition) is not > in the current TU, an ‘undeclared method’?
Oops, sorry. I thought this was a much more useful warning than it actually is. >< I still think "using @selector on method" is the wrong phrasing, though. "no method with selector %0 implemented in this translation unit"? _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
