On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 03:17:18AM -0800, Renato Golin wrote: > > This will create the notion that the IAS *will* validate the assembly > > and be picky no matter what, which will push people back to using GNU > > assembly for most cases. We want the exact opposite, > > (a) I think IAS should be doing this validation. > (b) I don't think we are ready for that yet. > > I'm working on a nice standalone tool for addressing (b), but for now I > think we shoul go back to not caring about the content of inline > assembler for -S mode. I continue to strongly disagree. I think that the implemented solution is essentially the correct solution. I also don't understand how a standalone tool will help anything, but that's likely because I don't know what standalone tool you're alluding to.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
