On 3 April 2014 17:05, Tim Northover <[email protected]> wrote:
> (and the mangling one myself -- Clang 3.4 was broken and
> in ABI violation in that respect, I don't like providing compatibility
> with broken).

I could accept this argument. Plus, this will create less problems
with external projects than the enum issue.

cheers,
--renato
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to