I don’t think we should separate the option interleave from the pragma 
vectorize. I mean, we should use the syntax #pragma vectorize 
{interleave(_value_), width(_value_), enable, disable}, because interleave and 
vectorization are related, enable/disable don’t add anything that isn’t already 
part of pragma vectorize enable/disable, and specifying `#pragma vectorize 
disable’ would disable interleaving.

As for safety, how about #pragma vectorize aggressive?

Tyler

On Apr 22, 2014, at 12:56 PM, Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Hal Finkel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I very much dislike the term 'interleave'. We had a great deal of
> > trouble with this term in the C++ committee. There are execution
> > models which want this information but do not guarantee
> > "interleaved" execution, and this is observable.
> 
> In this particular case, I think this objection is misplaced. The particular 
> transformation that we're discussing is, literally, one that provides 
> interleaving of loop iterations. We could also call it unsequenced (as I 
> mentioned in some earlier e-mail), but in some sense, this transformation is 
> more specific than that.
> 
> I understand that. But I'm somewhat concerned *promising* it in the pragma. 
> It seems better to use a more generic term if there is a good one that 
> applies, and widen seems to.
> 
> > If this is just a cost model hint, I like "widen" quite a bit better,
> > and maybe there is a way to work "hint" or "cost" into the name?
> 
> In some sense it is a cost model hint, but I'm not sure a user would see it 
> as such.
> 
> Yea, I see that too.
>  
> 
> Using hint for the non-safety-asserting variants seems like a good idea. We 
> should be clear with the users whether they are providing only a hint, or 
> asserting something more.
> 
> Indeed. This is the key part. 
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to