On 28/04/2014 10:09, Alp Toker wrote:
On 28/04/2014 08:37, Dmitri Gribenko wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Alp Toker <[email protected]> wrote:
Most of all I'm certain that ~20,000 LoC can be reduced for what
boils down
to parsing a few comments and checking that param commands match the
user's
function parameters.
Given that I am the primary author of this code, I am skeptical of
such claims. Doxygen is complicated, non-trivial to parse, and
non-uniform in its syntax and semantic rules.
I really appreciate that and I want to help get your work in the hands
of more users. The goal is most certainly not to trivialise the work,
but to see if there are ways to make it move faster :-)
Hi Dimitry,
I would like to jump in and backup Alp here. Having seen the commits
that add HTML verification to clang I was also very surprised. I am sure
you have good reasons to do so, but as implementing full HTML parsing
and verification in clang is at least surprising, I would personally be
interested in a cfe-dev@ email that explains your motivation and
reasoning, other possible options (e.g. external libraries) and why you
decided to go for the approach you take.
Thanks,
Tobias
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
