On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Tobias Grosser <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 28/04/2014 10:09, Alp Toker wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 28/04/2014 08:37, Dmitri Gribenko wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Alp Toker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Most of all I'm certain that ~20,000 LoC can be reduced for what
>>>> boils down
>>>> to parsing a few comments and checking that param commands match the
>>>> user's
>>>> function parameters.
>>>
>>> Given that I am the primary author of this code, I am skeptical of
>>> such claims. Doxygen is complicated, non-trivial to parse, and
>>> non-uniform in its syntax and semantic rules.
>>
>>
>> I really appreciate that and I want to help get your work in the hands
>> of more users. The goal is most certainly not to trivialise the work,
>> but to see if there are ways to make it move faster :-)
>
>
> Hi Dimitry,
>
> I would like to jump in and backup Alp here. Having seen the commits that
> add HTML verification to clang I was also very surprised. I am sure you have
> good reasons to do so, but as implementing full HTML parsing and
> verification in clang is at least surprising, I would personally be
> interested in a cfe-dev@ email that explains your motivation and reasoning,
> other possible options (e.g. external libraries) and why you decided to go
> for the approach you take.
Hi Tobias,
I have posted an email to cfe-dev and CC'ed you.
Dmitri
--
main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
(j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <[email protected]>*/
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
