On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 05:13:16PM -0700, Nico Weber wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger
> <jo...@britannica.bec.de> wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 02:50:16PM -0700, Nico Weber wrote:
> >> small.cc:6:18: error: missing sentinel in function call
> >> [-Werror,-Wsentinel]
> >> foo("bar", NULL);
> >
> > This is just broken code. Why we do we want to workaround that?
>
> Linux is kind of common, and there's no good way to work around this
> problem on an application code level that I can see.
Yes, there is. It has always been the case that portable code *must* use
(void *)NULL or equivalent as sentinal. For C++11, nullptr is
acceptable, for C++03 NULL is not.
Joerg
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
