Looks good modulo comments. Thanks for working on this!

================
Comment at: clang-tidy/ClangTidy.h:116
@@ -114,2 +115,3 @@
   std::unique_ptr<ClangTidyCheckFactories> CheckFactories;
+  const ClangTidyOptions &Options;
 };
----------------
I'd not make any assumptions about the life-time of Options. Please just copy 
it here, not store a reference.

================
Comment at: test/clang-tidy/temporaries.cpp:1
@@ +1,2 @@
+// RUN: clang-tidy -checks=clang-analyzer-core.NullDereference 
-analyze-temporary-dtors %s -- > %t.log
+// FileCheck complains if the input file is empty, so add a dummy line.
----------------
Add -disable-checks='', so that we don't rely on its default value.

================
Comment at: test/clang-tidy/temporaries.cpp:2
@@ +1,3 @@
+// RUN: clang-tidy -checks=clang-analyzer-core.NullDereference 
-analyze-temporary-dtors %s -- > %t.log
+// FileCheck complains if the input file is empty, so add a dummy line.
+// RUN: echo foo >> %t.log
----------------
Could you instead add test code which actually generates a core.NullDereference 
warning, so that we can be sure it's not just completely disabled.

  // CHECK-NOT: warning
  void testNullPointerDereferencePositive() {
    int *value = 0;
    // CHECK: :[[@LINE+1]]:3: warning: .....
    *value = 1;
  }

  // CHECK-NOT: warning
  <the rest of your test case>

http://reviews.llvm.org/D3556



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to