No, I don't.

Pedro

On 19/05/14 12:03, Joey Gouly wrote:

Pedro, do you have commit access? If not, I can commit it for you.

Joey

*From:*[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Neil Henning
*Sent:* 19 May 2014 11:44
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [PATCH] Clang: Reject OpenCL workgroup size requirement of 0

Any reason why the additional test in invalid-kernel-attrs.cl only tests whether the Z dimension is 0? Would be useful to ensure no regressions occur that we test each dimension (Perhaps you could just submit additional testing in a further review though, no need to hold up this patch any longer - the patch LGTM otherwise!)

Cheers,
-Neil.

On 19/05/2014 11:30, Pedro Ferreira wrote:

    Any more comments on this?

    On 13/05/14 17:09, Pedro Ferreira wrote:

        Your wish is my command.

        On 13/05/14 16:18, Joey Gouly wrote:

        LGTM too, but please add a test case to invalid-kernel-attrs.cl.

        -----Original Message-----
        From: [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Tweed
        Sent: 13 May 2014 11:50
        To: 'Pedro Ferreira'; [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        Subject: RE: [PATCH] Clang: Reject OpenCL workgroup size
        requirement of 0

        The patch LGTM.
        -----Original Message-----
        From: [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pedro
        Ferreira
        Sent: 13 May 2014 10:03
        To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        Subject: [PATCH] Clang: Reject OpenCL workgroup size
        requirement of 0

        OpenCL allows us to define the workgroup size used in a kernel
        in order
        to further optimise the code, specifically to that size.
        The syntax is
        __attribute__((reqd_work_group_size(X, Y, Z)))

        where X, Y and Z are compile-time known integers.
        Currently clang allows any of those to be 0, which would be
        illegal in
        OpenCL.

        The attached patch adds this validation; it's currently a
        draft and any
        comments would be welcome.

        (I reported this on bug 19699)




        _______________________________________________
        cfe-commits mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits







        _______________________________________________

        cfe-commits mailing list

        [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>

        http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits





    _______________________________________________

    cfe-commits mailing list

    [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>

    http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to