Just to make sure, did you mean this: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/builds/10289/steps/bootstrap%20clang/logs/stdio ? This is clang build using -DLLVM_ENABLE_WERROR=ON and report comes from clang, sanitizers are not involved, right?
If you think this is a false positive, shouldn't we fix it in clang? On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Aaron Ballman <[email protected]> wrote: > Author: aaronballman > Date: Fri Jun 6 08:39:32 2014 > New Revision: 210333 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=210333&view=rev > Log: > Quieting a false-positive which was causing the sanitizer bots to go red. > > Modified: > cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaStmtAttr.cpp > > Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaStmtAttr.cpp > URL: > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaStmtAttr.cpp?rev=210333&r1=210332&r2=210333&view=diff > > ============================================================================== > --- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaStmtAttr.cpp (original) > +++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaStmtAttr.cpp Fri Jun 6 08:39:32 2014 > @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static Attr *handleLoopHintAttr(Sema &S, > .Case("interleave_count", LoopHintAttr::InterleaveCount) > .Default(LoopHintAttr::Vectorize); > > - int ValueInt; > + int ValueInt = 0; > if (Option == LoopHintAttr::Vectorize || Option == > LoopHintAttr::Interleave) { > if (!ValueInfo) { > S.Diag(ValueLoc->Loc, diag::err_pragma_loop_invalid_keyword) > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
