On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Kostya Serebryany <[email protected]> wrote: > Just to make sure, did you mean this: > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/builds/10289/steps/bootstrap%20clang/logs/stdio > ? > This is clang build using -DLLVM_ENABLE_WERROR=ON and report comes from > clang, sanitizers are not involved, right? > > If you think this is a false positive, shouldn't we fix it in clang?
Ah, yes, I did mean that, but I see now that it's not a sanitizer that's at fault. Things suddenly make more sense. :-) Yes, I do think we should fix it in clang. I'll see if I can repro in a smaller test case and report it. Thanks! ~Aaron _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
