On 23 Jun 2014, at 15:13, Renato Golin <[email protected]> wrote:
> The main issue with your patch is that it can change user expected > behaviour, and I can't tell you what is the expected behaviour in > Darwin or BSD. If people usually use "unknown" in triples, this will > break their builds. If not, this could break the build of someone who > does. I think (Hat: FreeBSD) we only expect to see unknown in the vendor field (e.g. i386-unknown-freebsd). If the OS field is unknown, rather than freebsd, then it's not one of ours and we aren't likely to care. I don't really like the way that we conflate OS with ABI, but then I don't really like anything about triples... David _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
