On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 03:31:55PM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: > On 23 Jun 2014, at 15:13, Renato Golin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The main issue with your patch is that it can change user expected > > behaviour, and I can't tell you what is the expected behaviour in > > Darwin or BSD. If people usually use "unknown" in triples, this will > > break their builds. If not, this could break the build of someone who > > does. > > I think (Hat: FreeBSD) we only expect to see unknown in the vendor > field (e.g. i386-unknown-freebsd). If the OS field is unknown, rather > than freebsd, then it's not one of ours and we aren't likely to care. > I don't really like the way that we conflate OS with ABI, but then > I don't really like anything about triples...
Except that last rant, I agree with s/FreeBSD/NetBSD. Joerg _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
