================
Comment at: test/SemaCXX/switch-implicit-fallthrough.cpp:285
@@ +284,3 @@
+
+int fallthrough_targets(int n) {
+ [[clang::fallthrough]]; // expected-error{{fallthrough annotation is outside
switch statement}}
----------------
Why did this code have to move? Aaron asked about it.http://reviews.llvm.org/D4258 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
