================
Comment at: test/SemaCXX/switch-implicit-fallthrough.cpp:285
@@ +284,3 @@
+
+int fallthrough_targets(int n) {
+ [[clang::fallthrough]]; // expected-error{{fallthrough annotation is outside
switch statement}}
----------------
Reid Kleckner wrote:
> Why did this code have to move? Aaron asked about it.
I've already answered on the list.
> Clang seems to stop producing warnings after the function containing errors,
> so the test with errors should be the last one (or maybe even in a separate
> file).
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4258
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
