On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Aaron Ballman <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree with Richard's opinion for the invented syntax, but this is a > bit different since this syntax is specified by NVidia and supported > on compilers other than clang. I am okay with this pragma not being in > the clang namespace since that makes the code compatible with other > compilers, presuming that clang's behavior matches that of other > compilers implementing the same syntax. One clarification on support in other compilers. Alas, Intel and IBM have slightly different syntax for the case where an unroll count is specified: IBM and Intel: #pragma unroll(n) CUDA: #pragma unroll n Mark > But I'm also curious as to > Richard's take. > > ~Aaron >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
