On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Mark Heffernan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Aaron Ballman <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> I agree with Richard's opinion for the invented syntax, but this is a >> bit different since this syntax is specified by NVidia and supported >> on compilers other than clang. I am okay with this pragma not being in >> the clang namespace since that makes the code compatible with other >> compilers, presuming that clang's behavior matches that of other >> compilers implementing the same syntax. > > > One clarification on support in other compilers. Alas, Intel and IBM have > slightly different syntax for the case where an unroll count is specified: > > IBM and Intel: > #pragma unroll(n) > > CUDA: > #pragma unroll n
Might be worth exploring whether we want to support both forms? The parsing for either is unambiguous. ~Aaron _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
