eugenis added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D10677#266595, @EricWF wrote:
> For the most part this looks good. I'm a touch concerned though about the > changes to the static initialization. The initializer is moved from within > the function body to outside it. Could you have somebody confirm this won't > affect the existing ABI? I'm pretty sure it only affects template evaluation order, and does not change the mangling of any name. Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D10677 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
